Having not visited Egypt for sometime makes it difficult to be objective in criticizing the constitution and the workings of the politics. However, looking at the economic indices we cannot deny that there is economic progress and development.
Having said that, it is necessary to ask: Is that the optimum economic progress that the country could have attained? With no doubt the answer is no. relying on indices in assessing the progress of a country can be deceptive and cannot reflect the actual situation of the workings of the politics and the markets in the country.
The level of poverty in the country have increased with no doubt, yet the GDP per capita increased resulting in increased disparity in income between the rich and the poor (Gini Coefficient), not that the number of the rich have increased. The major problem the poor are having in Egypt is the exclusion from political participation and misrepresentation. In my opinion not only the poor are excluded from political participation, but also the youth and the eroded middle class. Of course, we are not talking here about the elites of the youth, which the national party present and use whenever change is demanded; we are talking about the ordinary youth and their energy that rests idle in the midst of a changing world that calls on every muscle to join the struggle against the economic dominance of China and the developed world.
The workings of the politics have lead to segregation of the community based on connections, not racial and tribal factors, but based on creation of islands of interests, attached to the ruling party, that serves as a monopoly. Such monopoly kills every talent and will that seek participation and growth. The tools for such social apartheid are numerous, from a controlled state media that serves like professional character assassin, to a brutal police force that can be deployed under any cause to suppress the demanding voices when need arises.
Another question needs to be answered, who opposes the change, in spite of the numerous people calling for it? With no doubt those are the beneficiaries of such statuesque. They are too lazy to create new connections in a new system and not sure if the new system will condone the economic atrocities that they have committed.
It is not normal that the sustainability of an economic system in a country of 80 millions to be tied to the presence of one person even if it is the president, he is not immortal. The negative fluctuation of the money and stocks markets when roomers erupts about his health, shows with no doubt that monopoly and autocracy is prevailing in such system and it would be risky for any foreign or even local investor to invest trasparently in such country.
In the end, it is necessary to mention that the voices calling on Mr. Baradei to partake in the Egyptian election for presidency are sentimental and emotional. Mr. Baradei has not indicated what he can do to take over such role, and what would be his vision for the country if he becomes the president. It seems that those voices are so desperate for change and Mr. Baradei ask them to pave the way for him instead of working his way through.
The wondering mind of
NED.